ports/95464: net/opal, net/ekiga: avoid double underscore in the library name, ...
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
jbq at caraldi.com
Fri Apr 7 10:50:20 UTC 2006
The following reply was made to PR ports/95464; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Jean-Baptiste Quenot <jbq at caraldi.com>
To: Joerg Pulz <Joerg.Pulz at frm2.tum.de>
Cc: bug-followup at FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/95464: net/opal, net/ekiga: avoid double underscore in the library name, ...
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 12:49:50 +0200
* Joerg Pulz:
> On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote:
>
> >Another question:
> >
> >What is the meaning of NO_FILTER_SHLIBS?
> >
> >It does not appear in the porter's handbook
>
> In FreeBSD, all libraries are normally have only a major version
> number. To prevent from any shlib name modification (e.g. minor
> number removal) by bsd.port.mk the ports Makefile should use
> NO_FILTER_SHLIBS=yes . See x11-toolkits/qt33, net/openh323 or
> devel/pwlib which install shared libraries with long names
> (lib<name>.so.<major>.<minor>.<patchlevel>) too.
OK I will submit a patch against the porter's handbook for that.
> >Also, why do you patch LDFLAGS in patch-opal_inc.mak?
> If you could take a closer look into the patch-opal_inc.mak
> again, you will surely find out, that the only line that gets
> changed is this one:
>
> - -OPAL_BASE = opal_$(PLATFORM_TYPE) +OPAL_BASE =_$(OPAL_SUFFIX)
> opal _$(OPAL_SUFFIX)
>
> Probably it loks like the LDFLAGS line gets chenged as the diff
> is a unified diff and this typically includes 3 lines before and
> 3 lines after the changed line.
Oh, sorry you're right.
Could you please resubmit your patch with the PORTREVISION typed
correctly?
Thanks for your help,
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs
mailing list