ports/71069: [MAINTAINER] mail/spamass-rules: update to 20040828

[Michael Ranner]

The following reply was made to PR ports/71069; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Michael Ranner <mranner at inode.at>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit at FreeBSD.org, mranner at inode.at
Cc: Yen-Ming Lee <leeym at FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: ports/71069: [MAINTAINER] mail/spamass-rules: update to 20040828
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 08:15:01 +0200

 We have discussed it with mat, pav and eik out of gnats. Last comment from eik 
 was:
 
 To return to your example: Both approaches are correct. You can try to 
 remove the directories, which will cause no harm since they are 
 non-empty by default, or just decide to leave them there, since they 
 are `owned' by another port. There is more than one way to do things, 
 and that is one reason for having port maintainers: some decisions can't 
 be made mechanically. Personally I would decide not to remove the 
 directories (since they are `owned' by mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin), but 
 it will cause no harm doing so (and supporting the `mtree-test'). 
 Especially since the directories are non-empty when SpamAssassin is 
 installed, so it's basically a no-op.
 
 If we like some democratic result, it stands 3 (rm pkg-plist) : 1 (keep it)
 so please commit ports/71069 and close the other.
 
 -- 
 /\/\ichael Ranner
 
 mranner at inode.at - mranner at jawa.at - mranner at bugat.at
 -----------------------------------------------------
    BSD Usergroup Austria - http://www.bugat.at/
 
 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
 GIT/CS/AT dx(-) s+:(++:) a- C++ UBLVS++++$ P++>+++$ L-(+)$ E---
 W+++$ N+(++) o-- K- w--()$ O-(--) M@ V-(--) PS+>++ PE(-) Y+ PGP(-)
 t+ 5+ X+++(++++) R* tv++ b+(++) DI++ D-(--) G- e h--(*) r++ y?
 ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------