ports/64444: [REPOCOPY REQUEST] editors/openoffice-1.1 -> editors/openoffice-1.1-devel

[Nakata Maho]

>Number:         64444
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       [REPOCOPY REQUEST] editors/openoffice-1.1 -> editors/openoffice-1.1-devel
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       high
>Responsible:    freebsd-ports-bugs
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Thu Mar 18 20:50:19 PST 2004
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Nakata Maho
>Release:        FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE i386
>Organization:
Private
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD debussy.private.org 5.2.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE #0: Wed Mar 17 10:05:34 JST 2004 maho at debussy.private.org:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/MAHO-debussy i386

>Description:
	OpenOffice.org (editors/openoffice-1.1 and its slave ports)
is very important for FreeBSD, however, speed of development of OOo
is extremely fast. So we must follow OOo's development status,
keeping up as far as opssible. Otherwise, we can easily forget everything!
(please consider that total source code line of OOo is comparable
to FreeBSD).
putting patch at FreeBSD's cvs repo.,  and committed OOo's cvs repo, and
delete... just an infinite loop.
In order to catch up the situation and doing coopration with other
developers, we need devel-port (namely editors/openoffice-1.1-devel),
so that everyone can regards this as a developmental stage and we can
easily gather other persons who are willing to do some test.

>How-To-Repeat:
	N/A
>Fix:
	please do repocopy
	editors/openoffice-1.1 -> editors/openoffice-1.1-devel
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: