ports/50444: Suggestion for new category: "dns"

["." at babolo.ru]

> The following reply was made to PR ports/50444; it has been noted by GNATS.
> 
> From: Kimura Fuyuki <fuyuki at hadaly.org>
> To: edwin at mavetju.org
> Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit at FreeBSD.org
> Subject: Re: ports/50444: Suggestion for new category: "dns"
> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 14:07:05 +0900
> 
>  At Mon, 31 Mar 2003 14:43:45 +1000,
>  Edwin Groothuis <edwin at mavetju.org> wrote:
>  > 
>  > On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 02:46:12PM +0900, Kimura Fuyuki wrote:
>  > > I believe that it is reasonable to introduce a new category "dns"
>  > > which consists of all the ports relating to the Domain Name System,
>  > > because:
>  > 
>  > Maybe it's time to see if there could be subcategories, so that you
>  > get net/dns, net/im, net/ping. The ports-system itself is modular
>  > enough to get it that way without too much problems.
>  
>  I saw someone proposed the plan but rejected by one of the portmgr, if
>  my memory is correct...
My ports/38593
There is not strict check on second level.
I'd prefer using PostgerSQL, but can
do strict check with make/sh/so on.
But I do not like list of categories as
part of bsd.port.mk and want to see it
in separate file

Does we interested in, say, pkg-description
in second level port directory trees
if it is interesting as bundle?

Oh, sysutils/portupgrade... it is out of my interests.