VIMAGE + PF crash in mbuf destructor

[Adrian Chadd]

Well I'm worried about _other_ stuff causing issues here.

So - what's the "right" behaviour? Does vnet/vimage make the
assumption that for all the mbuf processing/free operations, the vnet
tag/state is set?


-adrian

On 22 July 2013 11:59, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Adrian Chadd <adrian at freebsd.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I don't think the default vnet context is the correct behaviour there.
>> We'd need to figure out what the vnet context of the mbuf is and set
>> that.
>>
>
> What do you think about Marko's suggestion to de-virtualize
> V_pf_mtag_z?  What would be the down side of that?
>
> I don't understand enough of the PF code to understand which variables need
> to
> be virtual and which don't.
>
> --
> Craig