kern/106400: fatal trap 12 at restart of PF with ALTQ if ng0
device has detached
Volker
volker at vwsoft.com
Wed Dec 6 12:20:18 PST 2006
The following reply was made to PR kern/106400; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Volker <volker at vwsoft.com>
To: "Boris S." <bst2006 at dva.dyndns.org>
Cc: bug-followup at FreeBSD.org, glebius at FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: kern/106400: fatal trap 12 at restart of PF with ALTQ if ng0
device has detached
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 21:16:03 +0100
Boris,
On 12/06/06 20:17, Boris S. wrote:
> I use ALTQ primarily for priorizing tcp acks.
> Tell me if I'm wrong, but I think it is not possible to priorize TCP
> ACKS on encapsulated PPPoE data on the 'real' interface.
You do this for example:
altq on xl0 ....
queue blabla ...
pass out on ng0 all queue(blablabla)
> Bandwidth limiting on ng0 works great if I left some bandwidth for the
> PPPoE overhead.
>
> Beside this, I can't currently limit the real interface, because the
> dsl-modem is connected in another room on the main LAN. I don't have a
> dedicated NIC for the modem.
As I understand your NAT gateway has just one NIC and you're using a
PPPoE pass-thru capable router?
If so, you may still be able to use one queue for local traffic and
one queue for external traffic (and sub-queues of both of course) on
your NIC. But that's a question of personal taste. If ALTQ works for
you your way, I would not effort a change.
Greetings,
Volker
More information about the freebsd-pf
mailing list