Bridge and PF

Max Laier max at love2party.net
Fri Aug 12 15:51:51 GMT 2005


On Friday 12 August 2005 17:45, Rod wrote:
> Found my answer :
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-pf/2005-April/000984.html
>
> >FreeBSD has no support for pf in its bridge code.
> >Neither has it IPv6 support.

This is not true.  As Scott suggested try if_bridge in 6.0 which has both IPv6 
and full pf support.  Additionally, pf is supported by the old bridge just 
use the same settings you would use for ipf.  The old bridge does not allow 
for stateful filtering however.  The same is true for ipf and ipfw with the 
old bridge code.

> On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 16:02, Rod wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does anyone know if their is a setting similar to that of ipf and ipfw
> > for setting bridged devices to use a firewall in sysctl e.g.
> >
> > for ipfw:
> >
> > net.link.ether.bridge.ipfw=1
> >
> > for ipf
> >
> > net.link.ether.bridge.ipfw=1
> >
> > Guessed at net.link.ether.bridge.pf=1 but no such luck. Is this at all
> > possible with PF on freebsd?
> >
> > kind regards
> >
> > Rod

-- 
/"\  Best regards,                      | mlaier at freebsd.org
\ /  Max Laier                          | ICQ #67774661
 X   http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/  | mlaier at EFnet
/ \  ASCII Ribbon Campaign              | Against HTML Mail and News
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/attachments/20050812/1c334977/attachment.bin


More information about the freebsd-pf mailing list