[pf4freebsd] Re: Is altq now in 5-CURRENT?

Max Laier max at love2party.net
Wed Sep 15 21:05:14 PDT 2004


On Saturday 12 June 2004 20:17, Ryan Verner wrote:
> Just went to test altq+pf; I see after a cvsup:
>
> /usr/src/sys/contrib/altq/altq
>
> Which seems to be an updated version of the tarball on:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/
>
> Does this mean now it's stable enough to be part of base?  Are there any
> special instructions to build this, or do I just make/install world and
> a new kernel with ALTQ enabled (as per instructions on URL2)?

Let's take a look at my commit message:

"Import parts of the ALTQ framework from latest KAME snapshot (which is up to
HEAD at this point). This will not exactly live in a vendor branch, but have
the vendor backing to make it easier to exchange diffs.

This will be followed by a diff which takes most of the .c files off the
vendor branch in order to:
 - add locking
 - disable ALTQ3_COMPAT code (which is outdated and "un-lockable")

There is work in progress to refine the configuration API. Import this "as
is" now to have more exposure time before 5-STABLE.

This is only the import, it will be some more days until you will actually
be able to compile ALTQ support into your kernel so don't hold your breath.
HEADUPs will be posted on current@ and net@ before this is actually enabled."

Hope that answers your question.

-- 
Best regards,				| mlaier at freebsd.org
Max Laier				| ICQ #67774661
http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/	| mlaier at EFnet
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/attachments/20040916/099d44da/attachment.bin


More information about the freebsd-pf mailing list