Unmaintained perl ports

[Steven Kreuzer]

On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 09:21:54AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> I was thinking about assigning those modules to perl at . What do you think of
> that idea?

Do you mean ports@? If so, I think that makes sense since someone is more
likely do adopt a port if the maintainer is set to ports at . When I see a module
set to perl@ it makes me think that it is actively maintained by the perl team
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-perl/attachments/20150505/6fcf2043/attachment.sig>