With or without .packlist?
Baptiste Daroussin
bapt at FreeBSD.org
Thu Oct 10 06:10:51 UTC 2013
Hi guys,
With the staging support, we can properly decide what we do pack or not inside
the packages, the question now is do we keep the .packlist (in that case they
need to be fixed because they are full of stage path :)) or should we just drop
those files and no package them at all.
It seems to me that most of the other operating systems are not packaging.
I have no clue what what those .packlist files are useful for, so I do have no
opinion, would be nice to get a perl@ claim on this soon, as we either need to
fix them or nuke them.
btw: sunpoet has a PR I'm sitting one because of that:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/182806
regards,
Bapt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-perl/attachments/20131010/1d6b5990/attachment.sig>
More information about the freebsd-perl
mailing list