The preferable version of Moose in the ports [Was: Re: svn commit: r318942 - head/devel/p5-Moose]

[Lars Balker]

The way I read the release-sequence in #moose, the 2.10 branch wasn't
supposed to be released non-trial, so going back to 2.0803 is probably the
wisest for now.


On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Anton Berezin <tobez at freebsd.org> wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:55:19PM +0800, wen heping wrote:
> > Is this a trila version ?
> >
> > 2.1002-TRIAL Thu, May 23, 2013
> >
> >   * re-release with -TRIAL flag, as is proper for 2.10* versions
>
> Recently I committed a Moose update to 2.1001 into the ports collection,
> but as wen notes, it almost immediately got re-released as 2.1002-TRIAL.
>
> I am not sure I know what this means - whether the whole 2.10* branch is
> "trial", or just the first version of it.
>
> And I am not sure what to do with my recent commit - whether to keep it in
> the ports, or revert back to 2.08* branch (bumping the PORTEPOCH in the
> process).
>
> I hope people on this list my have opinions, and I invite you to share
> them.
>
> Thanks,
> \Anton.
> --
> Our society can survive even a large amount of irrational regulation.
>   -- John McCarthy
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-perl at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-perl
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-perl-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>



-- 
Lars Balker                                                  Consult::Perl