Ports with MAINTAINER= perl@FreeBSD.org

[Lars Balker Rasmussen]

On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 2:18 AM, Sahil Tandon <sahil at tandon.net> wrote:
> These ports are maintained by perl at .  I am happy to adopt these ports if
> perl@ is akin to ports@ in that these ports are up for adoption.  I
> don't want to step on any toes so I will submit a PR to make the change
> if there are no objections.

I'm sure everybody who read this thought "Someone else will answer",
so it didn't get done.  No, perl@ is not the same as ports at .  It's not
generally a good idea to have important ports (like p5-Moose) relying
on a single person or maintainer-timeouts if a sane community is
available to handle the job.  Please pass maintainer-ship back to
perl at .

(Speaking as the former maintainer of p5-Moose, who helped prove the
point made above).
-- 
Lars Balker Rasmussen                                        Consult::Perl