Network performance comparison of DragonflyBSD, FreeBSD and Linux

[Matthias Gamsjager]

Maybe someone should retest and see where the problem.
It doesn't help in saying the test sucks or is done wrong.



On 9 March 2017 at 20:26, O. Hartmann <ohartmann at walstatt.org> wrote:

> Am Tue, 7 Mar 2017 02:14:44 +0100
> Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd at quip.cz> schrieb:
>
> > There is some comparison of DragonflyBSD, FreeBSD and two versions of
> > Linux in specific network benchmark - HTTP/1.1 short lived connections.
> > FreeBSD is the worst in this test.
> >
> > https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2017/03/06/19425.html
> >
> > https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/1K.png
> > https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/8K.png
> > https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/16K.png
> >
> > https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perf_cmp.pdf
> >
> > Miroslav Lachman
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-performance at freebsd.org mailing list
> > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-
> unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
> Thank you so much for this finding.
>
> It is interesting that with a generic kernel, the "performance" is roughly
> the half of
> what Linux and DFBSD would give.
>
> I miss performance benchmarks, it seems, that over the past couple of
> years this habit
> has become quite unusual for FreeBSD.
>
> Oliver
>
> --
> O. Hartmann
>
> Ich widerspreche der Nutzung oder Übermittlung meiner Daten für
> Werbezwecke oder für die Markt- oder Meinungsforschung (§ 28 Abs. 4 BDSG).
>