FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3

Daniel Bilik daniel.bilik at
Sun Mar 24 09:47:30 UTC 2013

On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 09:11:53 +0100
Davide D'Amico <davide.damico at> wrote:

> Ok, I'll try tomorrow and I'll post results here. Some particular
> parameter to use?

Well, sysbench's "simple" is really simple ;-), it performs a single
SELECTs (unlike "nontrx", which can be made to perform also writes). Table
size you've chosen, 10M of rows, is IMHO reasonable, as it can be
considered "big" table but at the same time it should fit into memory
completely (so you don't unintentionally pull controller and/or disks into
the picture). I would also recommend to disable query cache for the test,
as it can influence the results for some test modes (and not only

						Daniel Bilik

More information about the freebsd-performance mailing list