Tor on FreeBSD Performance issues

[Julian Wissmann]

 1086 tor      RET   read 1568/0x620
  1086 tor      CALL  clock_gettime(0xd,0x7fffffffd910)
  1086 tor      RET   clock_gettime 0
  1086 tor      CALL  kevent(0x3,0x3e18000,0x2,0x3dbe000,0x400,0x7fffffffd920)
  1086 tor      GIO   fd 3 wrote 64 bytes

1086 tor      RET   kevent 3
  1086 tor      CALL  clock_gettime(0x4,0x7fffffffd940)
  1086 tor      RET   clock_gettime 0
  1086 tor      CALL  gettimeofday(0x7fffffffd930,0)
  1086 tor      RET   gettimeofday 0
  1086 tor      CALL  recvfrom(0xbc2,0x4822020,0x3e40,0,0,0)
  1086 tor      GIO   fd 3010 read 4096 bytes

As I understand kevent to be part of queue I go with yes here. What I also take from it is a huge number of clock_gettime() and gettimeofday() calls.

Julian

Am 08.02.2012 um 17:39 schrieb Adrian Chadd:

> Can you verify that it's properly using kqueue, rather than poll?
> 
> 
> Adrian

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance/attachments/20120208/b423ebcd/signature.pgp