Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs
    Stefan Lambrev 
    stefan.lambrev at moneybookers.com
       
    Fri Jan  7 15:40:05 UTC 2011
    
        - Previous message: Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs
 
        - Next message: Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs
 
         -  Messages sorted by: 
              [ date ]
              [ thread ]
              [ subject ]
              [ author ]
         
 
       
    
  
Hi,
Having in mind that a SAS enterprise disk normally can handle 150-180IOPS, this benchmark is testing something else ;)
Well there is a one thing which is clear from almost every Phoronix benchmark - Linux is heavily optimized ... for unpacking the linux kernel :)
On Jan 7, 2011, at 4:12 PM, Paul Pathiakis wrote:
> The results came out like this:
> 
> EXT3 - ~3000 tps
> EXT4 - ~3800 tps
> XFS - ~ 1800 tps
> ZFS - 75000 tps
--
Best Wishes,
Stefan Lambrev
ICQ# 24134177
    
    
        
	- Previous message: Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs
 
	- Next message: Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs
 
         -  Messages sorted by: 
              [ date ]
              [ thread ]
              [ subject ]
              [ author ]
         
 
       
More information about the freebsd-performance
mailing list