FreeBSD vs Ubuntu - Discuss...
leccine at gmail.com
Wed Sep 30 12:22:08 UTC 2009
have you seen the previous mail about 8.0 and debug stuff?
you might have overlooked it.
yes UFS is not the fastest, it is FAT16, stick to that :)
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:49 PM, S4mmael <s4mmael at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Since the article says that they left the debugging features on I think
> > this has a bit to do with it. Obviously the testers didn't care to read
> > documentation, and didn't seem to care to use the same compiler which is
> > available in ports, I believe it is safe to chuck this lame benchmark.
> What about FreeBSD 7.2? All debug featureas are 100% off in this
> version, but test results are the same as in 8.0
> Besides, UFS is known to be not the fastest FS. So, there is no reason
> to be suprised.
> freebsd-performance at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-performance-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
the sun shines for all
More information about the freebsd-performance