filesystem: 12h to delete 32GB of data

Gary Gatten Ggatten at waddell.com
Wed May 6 18:50:23 UTC 2009


OT now, but in high i/o envs with high concurrency needs, RAID5 is still the way to go, esp if 90% of i/o is reads. Of course it depends on file size / type as well... Anyway, let's sum it up with "a storage subsystem is only as fast as its slowest link"

----- Original Message -----
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek at wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: Bill Moran <wmoran at potentialtech.com>
Cc: Gary Gatten; Benjamin Krueger <benjamin at seattlefenix.net>; freebsd-performance at freebsd.org <freebsd-performance at freebsd.org>; Olivier Mueller <om-lists-bsd at omx.ch>; freebsd-questions at freebsd.org <freebsd-questions at freebsd.org>
Sent: Wed May 06 13:31:53 2009
Subject: Re: filesystem: 12h to delete 32GB of data

> yes, some of them suck royally.

you should rather say "some of them doesn't suck".





<font size="1">
<div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in'>
</div>
"This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient
 and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential.
 If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
 any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email
 and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited.  If you have
 received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by
 return email and delete this email from your system."
</font>



More information about the freebsd-performance mailing list