System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x
bbump at rsts.org
Fri Feb 15 15:47:17 UTC 2008
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Uwe Doering wrote:
> Have you tried sorting this list alphabetically? Believe it or not,
> when I tried to use Apache 1.3.x with PHP 5.2.x with extensions in
> arbitrary order I got inexplicable crashes, too.
> Now, of course it was just a coincidence that it worked for me after
> sorting the extension list. What this in fact points to is that the
> order of extensions can be important in that list, for whatever reason.
> For me it worked after sorting the list, but YMMV. Might be worth a
> try, though.
> Uwe Doering | EscapeBox - Managed On-Demand UNIX Servers
> gemini at geminix.org | http://www.escapebox.net
Ran it stock, sorted, read a thread a while back about someone who thought
you should have mysql first, then imap, then blah blah blah, nothing made
any difference. The machine tends to always show about 98% memory used,
although at any point in time 1/2 of that could be inact. The malloc
errors in the apache logs made me consider the idea of adding more memory
to the box (but there are always pundits that say, "wow, more than 2g?").
More information about the freebsd-performance