System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x

Kostik Belousov kostikbel at gmail.com
Tue Apr 22 13:36:02 UTC 2008


On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 07:20:31PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 02:08:18PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >>Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:31:45PM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
> >>>>On Thu, 21-Feb-2008 at 14:13:22 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >>>>>On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 04:20:04AM -0700, Brett Bump wrote:
> >>>>>>On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>I cannot reproduce it locally. With patch applied, it compiles both
> >>>>>>>GENERIC and GENERIC with options QUOTA added just fine.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Check for partially applied patch.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>Thanks Kostik.  You can double check me on sizes, but it would appear 
> >>>>>>that
> >>>>>>all files in the patch were touched, and I double checked my sources 
> >>>>>>with:
> >>>>>>ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/6.2-RELEASE/src which 
> >>>>>>are
> >>>>>The patch is against RELENG_6, not against RELENG_6_2. I see no point
> >>>>>in backporting it to RELENG_6_2.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>BTW, I backported two fixes, one for another deadlock with snapshots 
> >>>>>and
> >>>>>quotas, another for "ffs_blkfree: block already freed" panic and 
> >>>>>followed
> >>>>>up fsck: softdep inconsistency error.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>New combined patch (against RELENG_6) is at
> >>>>>http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/quotagiant/quotas-RELENG_6-20080221-1202.patch
> >>>>I tried to apply this patch to recent RELENG_6 sources
> >>>>but it failed at a lot of places. I think this is due to
> >>>>changes to the tree after the above patch was made.
> >>>>
> >>>>Is there any newer patch available or is it possible to make
> >>>>one which applies to recent RELENG_6 sources?
> >>>http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/quotagiant/quotas-RELENG_6-20080422-1000.patch
> >>>
> >>>May be, I shall commit it finally.
> >>FYI scottl@ was asking about this yesterday, and seemed interested in 
> >>helping you to get it committed if necessary.
> >
> >My worry is the possible mismerge. I do prefer to commit it now, after
> >some authoritative "no problem seen" message.
> 
> I'll merge it into the FreeBSD 6 tree at Yahoo, get some testing done on 
> it, and then let you know how it goes.

Thank you !
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance/attachments/20080422/e275c329/attachment.pgp


More information about the freebsd-performance mailing list