System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x

Andre Albsmeier Andre.Albsmeier at
Tue Apr 22 11:29:31 UTC 2008

On Thu, 21-Feb-2008 at 14:13:22 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 04:20:04AM -0700, Brett Bump wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > 
> > > I cannot reproduce it locally. With patch applied, it compiles both
> > > GENERIC and GENERIC with options QUOTA added just fine.
> > >
> > > Check for partially applied patch.
> > >
> > 
> > Thanks Kostik.  You can double check me on sizes, but it would appear that
> > all files in the patch were touched, and I double checked my sources with:
> > which are
> The patch is against RELENG_6, not against RELENG_6_2. I see no point
> in backporting it to RELENG_6_2.
> BTW, I backported two fixes, one for another deadlock with snapshots and
> quotas, another for "ffs_blkfree: block already freed" panic and followed
> up fsck: softdep inconsistency error.
> New combined patch (against RELENG_6) is at

I tried to apply this patch to recent RELENG_6 sources
but it failed at a lot of places. I think this is due to
changes to the tree after the above patch was made.

Is there any newer patch available or is it possible to make
one which applies to recent RELENG_6 sources?



"I think there is a world market for maybe five computers."
                     - Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, 1943

More information about the freebsd-performance mailing list