BIND 9.4.1 performance on FreeBSD 6.2 vs. 7.0

[NOC Meganet]

On Thursday 14 June 2007 05:48:17 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> 6.2 was used from CVS with libthr and the 4BSD scheduler (ULE 1.0 is
> broken in 6.x).

just curious what is broken because I use ULE on several servers perfectly. it 
seems to me that ULE is even faster on SMP when not having heavy load. 
Also "calcru went backwards" issues I do not get with ULE but sporadically on 
4BSD scheduler kernels, specially on dualcore cpus.



HM

--

Prowip Telecom Ltda
AS 22706







A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik  https://datacenter.matik.com.br