BIND 9.4.1 performance on FreeBSD 6.2 vs. 7.0
tec at mega.net.br
Thu Jun 14 13:55:48 UTC 2007
On Thursday 14 June 2007 05:48:17 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> 6.2 was used from CVS with libthr and the 4BSD scheduler (ULE 1.0 is
> broken in 6.x).
just curious what is broken because I use ULE on several servers perfectly. it
seems to me that ULE is even faster on SMP when not having heavy load.
Also "calcru went backwards" issues I do not get with ULE but sporadically on
4BSD scheduler kernels, specially on dualcore cpus.
Prowip Telecom Ltda
A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
More information about the freebsd-performance