diskio low read performance
kris at obsecurity.org
Sat Jan 13 10:00:41 PST 2007
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 03:41:21PM -0200, Michel Santos wrote:
> Kris Kennaway disse na ultima mensagem:
> > On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 09:53:47AM -0200, Michel Santos wrote:
> >> I forgot to say that I tried it already. Even if it gave me no
> >> improvement
> >> I have it in 16 at this time together with a higher
> >> vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem
> >> value.
> >> Sincerley, any of the configuration changes I did gave me absolutely
> >> nothing in relationship to the disk read access performance. That is
> >> disappointing.
> >> Should I go back and try ufs1 perhaps? Or is it that squid does not work
> >> well on 6.2?
> > Is it the same version of squid, same configuration, etc?
> > Kris
> Yes, if you used to squid I am running the last 2.5-Stable14 version which
> run best on 4.11
OK, please provide further details of your system configuration
(dmesg, kernel config).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance/attachments/20070113/06113b38/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-performance