diskio low read performance

Kris Kennaway kris at obsecurity.org
Sat Jan 13 08:42:35 PST 2007

On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 09:53:47AM -0200, Michel Santos wrote:

> I forgot to say that I tried it already. Even if it gave me no improvement
> I have it in 16 at this time together with a higher vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem
> value.
> Sincerley, any of the configuration changes I did gave me absolutely
> nothing in relationship to the disk read access performance. That is
> disappointing.
> Should I go back and try ufs1 perhaps? Or is it that squid does not work
> well on 6.2?

Is it the same version of squid, same configuration, etc?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance/attachments/20070113/359c32f1/attachment.pgp

More information about the freebsd-performance mailing list