Fine-grained locking for POSIX local sockets (UNIX domain
kris at obsecurity.org
Sun May 7 19:59:44 UTC 2006
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 08:57:21PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
> >On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 10:00:41PM +0300, Sven Petai wrote:
> >>The results in my mail were mean values over 2 runs,
> >>only once did I see really huge (more than 10%) differences between
> >>subsequent runs with same settings, this case was clearly mentioned in
> >>the results.
> >FYI, 2 is not really enough, you should do at least 10 repetitions of each
> >test to reduce variance (which can be a lot, despite what you saw!) and so
> >that differences between them can be accurately estimated. Ministat is
> >really helpful for this.
> Typically, I do 12 runs of supersmack in each configuration, and discard
> the first 2 runs in which the cache and scheduler (etc) are still settling,
> as I'm interested in the steady state.
Yeah, forgot to mention that too. Also keeping in mind that mysql
performance is not time-constant, e.g. you should restart it in
between test configurations instead of comparing early and late times.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance/attachments/20060507/3b83a06d/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-performance