Bad performance on alpha? (make buildworld)

[Oliver Lehmann]

Bernd Walter wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 09:54:57PM +0100, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> > Bernd Walter wrote:
> > 
> > > I think thats around factor 2-4 slower.
> > > Especially without having CPUTYPE >=ev56 set.
> > 
> > Ok, I have CPUTYPE=ev56 now set in make.conf and I got slightly better
> > results:
> > 
> >  make	  buildworld	19144.53 real	  16475.63 user      1964.88 sys
> >  make -j2 buildworld	19530.91 real	  16784.12 user      2143.32 sys
> >  make -j3 buildworld	19639.32 real	  16948.23 user      2173.32 sys
> >  make -j4 buildworld	19892.68 real	  17177.20 user      2202.12 sys
> > 
> > I installed the last buildworld and built a new kernel... let's see
> > how those new (with CPUTYPE=56 compiled) binaries are performing...
> > *reruning-tests*
> 
> The binaries are only used to build the toolchain.
> The remaining part of the buildworld aren't using the system binaries.

Hm... actually it performs a _bit_ better with the new world+kernel ;)

make     buildworld     18749.83 real     16143.33 user      1981.61 sys
make     buildworld     18758.40 real     16191.54 user      1999.10 sys
make -j2 buildworld     19297.45 real     16570.93 user      2127.90 sys
make -j2 buildworld     <not yet finished>

Next I'll try some CFLAGs...

-- 
 Oliver Lehmann
  http://www.pofo.de/
  http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/