The effects of WITNESS and INVARIANTS
Willem Jan Withagen
wjw at withagen.nl
Tue Feb 24 14:12:02 PST 2004
From: "Robert Watson" <rwatson at FreeBSD.ORG>
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>
> > Just out of curriousity, and 'cause I've got some idle boxes, I started
> > to do some (NFS-)performance testing. There is still a long way to go,
> > but I've but a first obvious result online running on the local server
> > disk.
> >
> > It makes the claims of the effects of WITNESS and INVARIANTS very
> > obvious. Look especially at the graph for "Sequential block read".
> >
> > You might want to have a look at:
> > http://withagen.dyndns.org/FreeBSD/nfs-performance/index.html. Note
> > that no NFS data is included. I have some Bonnie-NFS data, but need to
> > write accompanying test and conclusions for it.
> >
> > Suggestions are more than welcomed.
>
> My primary suggestion is "Turn off WITNESS and INVARIANTS when
> benchmarking or for production systems". We turn them off in releases,
> and once 5.x becomes 5-stable, we'll turn it off by default also. However,
> they're invaluable tools when debugging the development system, so we have
> them on in the development branch by default. I would encourage people to
> generally run with them turned on unless performance of a system requires
> them to be off, as it really helps the debugging process, as well as
> helping to identify locking problems as the system evolves.
Hi Robert,
I understand your concern and will take your remark as made here, and put it
in the document as a "Nota Bene"...
And I'll emphasise the fact that the 5-stable fact is the turning corner for
this matter.
--WjW
More information about the freebsd-performance
mailing list