strange performance dip shown by iozone
Gary Stanley
gary at outloud.org
Fri Feb 20 11:35:18 PST 2004
Here's some knobs to try, ie;
RAID5: Write Back Cache, Normal Read Ahead, and Direct I/O
RAID1: Write Through Cache, Normal Read Ahead, and Direct I/O
That picked up my write speeds just enough so it wasn't nearly as bad
writing as reading.
At 02:27 PM 2/20/2004, you wrote:
>On Feb 20, 2004, at 11:47 AM, mi+mx at aldan.algebra.com wrote:
>>Also, is the RAID5 writing speed supposed to be _so much_ worse, than
>>that of a single disk?
>
>it's normal for RAID-5 write performance to be slower than that of a bare
>drive. RAID filesystems involve tradeoffs between cost, performance, and
>reliability. RAID-5 maximizes cost and reliability at the expense of
>performance....
>
>--
>-Chuck
>
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-performance at freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-performance
mailing list