Tuning for PostGreSQL Database
mbsd at pacbell.net
Tue Jul 22 09:31:58 PDT 2003
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 21 Jul 2003 at 20:35, Jason Stone wrote:
> > I feel like this is an extremely important point. If softupdates changes
> > the semantics of sync(2)/fsync(2), then it absolutely has to be off for a
> > postgresql server because postgresql counts on fsync in order to make its
> > durability guarantees.
> If this means all FreeBSD-PostgreSQL users need to change their
> setup, we need to do something ASAP. I'd first recommend getting the
> confirmation from the PostgreSQL team, then adjusting the PostgreSQL
> documenation and the FreeBSD port.
> Does anyone feel this is urgent enough that they'll do something
> about it?
I think you can relax. Check the mailing lists, or google a bit and
you'll find similar discussions. For example:
In short: fsync() works with soft-updates. Too many things would
More information about the freebsd-performance