adrian+freebsd-perf at ubergeeks.com
Wed Apr 30 14:50:48 PDT 2003
On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Monday 28 April 2003 10:54, Piotr Rybicki wrote:
> > Hi everyone.
> > In man tuning(7) we read, that swap size should be about 2x main memmory
> > size. Why swap size should be so big? Isn't swap size equal to main memmory
> > size enough?
> IMHO the swapsize=2x phys. mem size has always been just a rule of thumb. You
> need as much swap as you need (doh). But so far, the memory requirements of
> software have pretty much grown proportionally with the availibility /
> affordability of bigger sticks of memory and thus the rule of thumb still
> makes sense. YMMV.
> Michael Nottebrock
It used to mean something. 1x for swapping (whole processes) and
1x for paging (just pages of a process). Each portion was used for exactly
one purpose. This is no longer a valid reason though. IIRC, it is because
FreeBSD has a unified buffer cache.
I don't know if there are any other reasons for 2x. I don't bothe
with more than 1x personally, if that much. Swap space is really there for
emergencies only IMHO.
[ adrian at ubergeeks.com ]
More information about the freebsd-performance