[PATCH] openoffice.org-2.0 fails to compile on 6-STABLE

NAKATA Maho chat95 at mac.com
Fri Nov 3 00:21:41 UTC 2006

From: Bartosz Fabianowski <freebsd at chillt.de>
Subject: [PATCH] openoffice.org-2.0 fails to compile on 6-STABLE
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 20:12:25 +0100

> Hi
> I have just upgraded from 2.0.3 to 2.0.4 and compilation broke for me on 
> three separate accounts. All three were manifestations of the same error 
> in OO.o's source: The keyword "NULL" is used to denote a null pointer, 
> which is legal in C but not in C++. The number "0" should be used 
> instead. I am surprised that nobody else seems to have run into this. 
> Maybe my gcc is more picky about standards for some reason? Either way, 
> if anybody else encounters this problem, trivial patches that fix it are 
> attached.
this is http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=71039 .

you supplied three patches
and in #i71039#, following patches are provided

as Caolan doesn't include following patch
how do you think? do you need this patch?

-- NAKATA, Maho (maho at FreeBSD.org)

More information about the freebsd-openoffice mailing list