ports/164230: repocopy request: editors/openoffice.org-3-devel to editors/apache-openoffice-3-devel

[Maho NAKATA]

Hi all,

Many thanks for discussion.

It looks all understands adding "apache" makes sense.

However, PKGNAMEPREFIX is defined as ${LANG_PKGNAME}, and PKGNAMESUFFIX is 
defined as ${LANG_SUFFIX} therefore, English and Japanese version 
should be something like: 

en-openoffice-3-devel_US
and
ja-openoffice-3-devel_JP
.

Adding apache looks long.
en-apache-openoffice-3-devel_US
ja-apache-openoffice-3-devel_JP

In my opinion, choosing politically correct one is good.

so let's have a ballot;
1. en-openoffice-3-devel_US
2. en-apache-openoffice-3-devel_US

for me,
2. en-apache-openoffice-3-devel_US

thanks


From: Eitan Adler <lists at eitanadler.com>
Subject: Re: Fw: ports/164230: repocopy request: editors/openoffice.org-3-devel to editors/apache-openoffice-3-devel
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:48:55 -0500

> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Pedro Giffuni <pfg at freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
>> Adding the Apache name to the brand is the standard Apache
>> policy and in the ports tree we already have more that
>> 50 ports for apache projects using the "Apache" name.
> 
> devel/subversion ?
> java/axis2 ?
> 
> It may make sense to add apache to PKGNAMEPREFIX but please don't move the port.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Eitan Adler
>