Bit twiddling question
sgk at troutmask.apl.washington.edu
Thu Mar 23 21:12:01 UTC 2017
----- Forwarded message from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask.apl.washington.edu> -----
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:52:25 -0700
From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
To: Bruce Evans <brde at optusnet.com.au>
Cc: freebsd-numerics at freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Bit twiddling question
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26)
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 05:46:34PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
(A large chuck removed)
> C11 doesn't have sincos*() or sind*() to make us more incomplete.
I've had a sincos*() implementation for a few years now.
You've seen it, and were dissatisfied with it because I
combined sin[fl] and cos[fl] kernels into sincos[kl] kernels.
----- End forwarded message -----
Whoops. Didn't mean to broadcast this to freebsd-numerics
lists as no Copyright statement is attached to code. Oh well.
More information about the freebsd-numerics