Bit twiddling question

[Steve Kargl]

----- Forwarded message from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask.apl.washington.edu> -----
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:52:25 -0700
From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
To: Bruce Evans <brde at optusnet.com.au>
Cc: freebsd-numerics at freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Bit twiddling question
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26)

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 05:46:34PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:

(A large chuck removed)

> 
> C11 doesn't have sincos*() or sind*() to make us more incomplete.
> 

I've had a sincos*() implementation for a few years now.  
You've seen it, and were dissatisfied with it because I
combined sin[fl] and cos[fl] kernels into sincos[kl] kernels. 

(deleted)

----- End forwarded message -----

Whoops.  Didn't mean to broadcast this to freebsd-numerics
lists as no Copyright statement is attached to code.  Oh well.

-- 
Steve
20161221 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbCHE-hONow