Status of expl logl

[Peter Jeremy]

On 2012-Aug-15 08:15:52 +1000, Bruce Evans <brde at optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>I hardly looked at e_pow.c before.  It is apparently half about repeating
>e_log.c and e_exp.c, to get at their extra internal precision.

I expect cpow() will similarly have to copy slabs of code from e_pow.c
to avoid losing precision or domain.  Is it worth pulling some of this
"common" code out so that it can be shared amongst all the different
functions that need it?

-- 
Peter Jeremy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-numerics/attachments/20120814/2cc61623/attachment.pgp