Use of C99 extra long double math functions after r236148

[Bruce Evans]

On Fri, 20 Jul 2012, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:

> On 07/20/2012 10:34 PM, Bruce Evans wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Jul 2012, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>> 
>>> Bruce, with both of us working at the same time on clog, it is getting
>>> hard for me to follow.  The version I sent this morning is the last
>>> change I made.
>>> 
>>> How about if you come the owner of the code for a while.  When you are
>>> finished, send it back to me, and I will look over everything you have
>>> done. I won't work on it until then.  This works for me in other ways
>>> too, because my life is very busy at the moment.
>> 
>> I'd prefer you (or Somone Else) to keep working on it.  I just plugged it
>> into my test framework and started zapping errors...  (I need to make my
>> test framework easier to set up so that I don't have any investment in
>> the not seeing the errors.)
>
> Do you have a piece of code after you made the changes?  Or did you only 
> record the changes in the emails you sent to me?  I was hoping that you could 
> send me a file as an attachment, with all your suggested changes.  But if I 
> have to go through all the emails you sent in the last few days, I guess I'll 
> have to do that.

I keep the code in a test program and copied it to the emails.  I don't
want to flood this thread with more copies of it yet :-), but won't
lose it.  In the old emails, it has my usual markup of '% ' indentation
for code and no indentation for comments so that it can easily be extracted.
Diffs would be unreadable since I reformatted everything.  I was hoping
you would reformat your version to KNF so that diffs can be small.

Bruce