'dropped due to full socket buffers' by SNMP
Victor Gamov
vit at otcnet.ru
Tue Jan 5 09:39:30 UTC 2021
Hi Eugene!
Thanks for your responces.
And Happy New Year for everyone!
On 01.01.2021 03:19, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 30.12.2020 23:08, Victor Gamov wrote:
>
>> As I understand hw.ix.flow_control=3 to allow flow-control for negotiation.
>> Real PAUSE setting will be set during negotiation.
>
> At the moment of congestion.
As I understand PAUSE feature negotiated during auto-negotiation
process. If flow-control disabled on one side (switch for example) then
other side (host) will not to use this feature too. Is it right?
>> So where I can find active flow-control setting for host interface?
>
> Can't check for ix just now, but for em(4) there is sysctl dev.em.0.fc.
> It should be similar for ix.
I have hw.ix.flow_control=3 (what does is it means ?) and dev.ix.0.fc=3
(and what does is it means?)
>>> maybe increase kern.ipc.maxsockbuf and then net.inet.udp.recvspace.
>> Eugene, at first message you suppose Host-A (sender) "outgoing link for that UDP packets is congested"
>> because this host shows non-zero "dropped due to full socket buffers".
>> So is net.inet.udp.recvspace increasing on Host-B (mainly receiver) will be affected for this congestion?
>
> Can't tell in details without going deep into your setup :-)
> You can try it yourself and verify quickly.
>
>> Or I need to try to increase both kern.ipc.maxsockbuf and net.inet.udp.recvspace on both hosts?
>
> Tune one that drops UDP.
>
>> Also how I can check current sockbuf usage?
>
> netstat -xn
Unfortunately it never shoes counters about UDP multicast traffic.
I'll increase kern.ipc.maxsockbuf and net.inet.udp.recvspace at next
week and write about results.
Back to my original question: is it possible to monitor `netstat -n -p
udp -f inet -s` counters by SNMP?
--
CU,
Victor Gamov
More information about the freebsd-net
mailing list