On Netgraph

Tom Marcoen tom.marcoen at gmail.com
Tue Jun 9 10:53:17 UTC 2020


Hey Julian,

That is what I had in mind. Though I was hoping I could put the encryption
in NetGraph too so that I would not see that interface on my host where I
do not need to see it.

On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 05:28, Julian Elischer <julian at freebsd.org> wrote:

> On 5/27/20 4:20 AM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> > 27.05.2020 15:06, Tom Marcoen wrote:
> >
> >> Hey all,
> >>
> >> I'm new to this mailing list and also quite new to FreeBSD (huray,
> welcome
> >> to me!) so bare with me, please.
> >>
> >> I'm reading up on Netgraph on how I can integrate it with FreeBSD jails
> and
> >> I was looking at some of the examples provided in
> >> /usr/share/examples/netgraph and now have the following question.
> >> The udp.tunnel example shows an iface point-to-point connection but it
> is
> >> unencrypted. Of course I could encrypt it with an IPsec tunnel on the
> host
> >> or tunnel it through SSH, but I was wondering whether there exists a
> nice
> >> Netgraph solution, e.g. a node with two hooks, receiving unencrypted
> >> traffic on the inside hook and sending out encrypted traffic on the
> outside
> >> hook.
> > There is ng_mppc(4) netgraph node capable to perform relatively weak
> MPPE encryption
> > (and/or compression) but it is designed to work with ng_ppp(4) node
> encapsulating IP packets into PPP frames.
> > I doubt it's very efficient for inter-jail traffic.
> >
> > Why do you need encryption for inter-jails traffic in first place?
> > Encryption is needed for traffic passing untrusted channels where data
> interception is possible
> > but inter-jail traffic does not leave the kernel at all until it hits
> destination jail.
> Once you have a udp tunnel set up you just need to set up an IPSEC SA
> to to encrypt just that tunnel.
> It's not required to do the encryption in netgraph.
> there is a script to make the tunnel in
> /usr/share/examples.netgraph/udp.tunnel
> you just need to set up the SA to catch it..
> you can also if you desire you can also put a netgraph bridge at both
> ends of the tunnel and have a single subnet connected by the link. The
> bridge nodes are "learning" so they will learn when to send packets over
> the link and when not to.
> You can also play tricks with FIBs so that tunnel envelope packets and all
> other packets use different routing tables.
>
>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-net at freebsd.org mailing list
> > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-net at freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>


More information about the freebsd-net mailing list