[Differential] [Commented On] D1809: [sockbuf] Don't expose lock details when isn't needed
davide (Davide Italiano)
phabric-noreply at FreeBSD.org
Wed Feb 11 08:54:59 UTC 2015
davide added a comment.
Robert,
an added (somewhat related) note.
SCTP has already its own sockbuf(s) and this makes integration very hackish in the tree. IIRC glebius experienced this himself while working on sendfile(), and I'm pretty sure rrs@ is kind of familiar with the problem. Introducing a better abstraction for sockbuf might help with this.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1809
To: davide, kmacy, np, rrs, lstewart, rwatson
Cc: julian, freebsd-net
More information about the freebsd-net
mailing list