does "nat redirect_port tcp" works for you on -CURRENT?
Ian Smith
smithi at nimnet.asn.au
Thu Feb 5 05:08:22 UTC 2015
On Thu, 5 Feb 2015 02:14:41 +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> On 05.02.2015 01:16, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
>
> > I have such rules in my firewall:
> >
> > nat 9 config redirect_port tcp 192.168.134.2:16881 16881
> > redirect_port udp 192.158.134.2:16881 16881 redirect_port tcp
> > 192.168.134.2:22 22222
> >
> > nat 1 config ip $EXT_IP same_ports
> One more datapoint: if I merge this to one NAT (and change rules
> accordingly), redirect work as expected.
>
> But I have TWO different NATs in full config (for two ISPs) and don't
> want to duplicate all redirection specifications, but want to use
> third "common" NAT config. And such usage is shown in ipfw(8)!
Just curious .. what's your value of net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass?
And does all of this really need cross-posting to net@ as well as ipfw@?
cheers, Ian
More information about the freebsd-net
mailing list