kern/178116: [tcp] [panic] Kernel panic: general protection fault in tcp_do_segment
Nate Denning
nate.denning at gmail.com
Wed May 8 14:40:01 UTC 2013
The following reply was made to PR kern/178116; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Nate Denning <nate.denning at gmail.com>
To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius at FreeBSD.org>
Cc: bug-followup at FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: kern/178116: [tcp] [panic] Kernel panic: general protection fault in tcp_do_segment
Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 08:30:01 -0600
On May 1, 2013, at 9:32 AM, Nate Denning <nate.denning at gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> On May 1, 2013, at 9:27 AM, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>=20
>> Nate,
>>=20
>> On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 09:26:04AM -0600, Nate Denning wrote:
>> N> > do you run any additional network modules: ipfw, pf, netgraph,
>> N> > accept filters, etc? How your system differes from a default
>> N> > installation?
>> N>=20
>> N> Yes, ipfilter, accf_http and accf_data (accf is for Apache). No =
ipfw, pf, or netgraph. Output of kldstat:
>>=20
>> I would suspect ipfilter. :(
>>=20
>> Is it possible for you to rewrite your rules to ipfw or pf and try
>> running with that?
>>=20
>=20
> Certainly, I'll switch to pf and see how that goes.
I switched to pf and I'm at about a week now with no panics where there =
were typically several per day with ipfilter. I need this host to be =
stable so I would like to stick to pf, but is there any more info, =
configs, etc. I can provide to help debug the ipfilter issue?
Thanks,
Nate=
More information about the freebsd-net
mailing list