TCP_KEEPIDLE vs TCPTV_KEEP_IDLE

[Richard Sharpe]

On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 6:28 AM, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 06:26:14AM -0700, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> R> Thank you for that answer. I don't have the option to install FreeBSD
> R> 9.1. Maybe we will move to 9.1 in the future.
> R>
> R> However, I now understand the issues better. Of course that does
> R> complicate my proposal on Samba technical, just a little.
>
> I don't understand the proposal. Samba correctly compiles with support
> for the discussed socket options on those operating systems that support
> them. No "fixes" to Samba are required, everything works correctly.

Perhaps there are others out there like us who have to stick with
earlier versions of FreeBSD where the symbols Samba currently uses are
not supported.

In the spirit of few or no surprises for users, a small amount of
#ifdef stuff will work.

Of course, my fellow Samba team members might decide that it is not worth it.

-- 
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂？唯有杜康。--曹操)