kern/178116: [tcp] [panic] Kernel panic: general protection fault in tcp_do_segment
Nate Denning
nate.denning at gmail.com
Wed May 1 15:30:01 UTC 2013
The following reply was made to PR kern/178116; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Nate Denning <nate.denning at gmail.com>
To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius at FreeBSD.org>
Cc: bug-followup at FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: kern/178116: [tcp] [panic] Kernel panic: general protection fault in tcp_do_segment
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 09:26:04 -0600
On May 1, 2013, at 8:02 AM, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> Nate,
>=20
> do you run any additional network modules: ipfw, pf, netgraph,
> accept filters, etc? How your system differes from a default
> installation?
>=20
Yes, ipfilter, accf_http and accf_data (accf is for Apache). No ipfw, =
pf, or netgraph. Output of kldstat:
Id Refs Address Size Name
1 15 0xffffffff80200000 1558e18 kernel
2 1 0xffffffff81759000 2324e0 zfs.ko
3 2 0xffffffff8198c000 84e8 opensolaris.ko
4 1 0xffffffff81a12000 330db ipl.ko
5 1 0xffffffff81a46000 163a accf_http.ko
6 1 0xffffffff81a48000 cda accf_data.ko
IPv4 is configured natively and IPv6 over a gif tunnel, with ipfilter =
rules setup for both. Other than all that I'm not seeing anything =
related to networking that is not default.
> Is it possible for you to run with INVARIANTS option in the kernel?
> The option adds additional debugging, thus hurts system performance,
> but with it we can obtain a more informative crashdump.
>=20
Yes, I can try that.
Thanks,
Nate
More information about the freebsd-net
mailing list