SO_REUSEPORT: strange kernel balancer behaviour

Adrian Chadd adrian at freebsd.org
Tue Jul 23 04:05:57 UTC 2013


On 22 July 2013 14:26, trafdev <trafdev at mail.ru> wrote:
> Actually overhead is almost zero, the real problem is in non-equivalent load
> distribution between processes.
> As https://lwn.net/Articles/542629/ mentions -
> "At Google, they have seen a factor-of-three difference between the thread
> accepting the most connections and the thread accepting the fewest
> connections;"
> I'm getting almost same results

On FreeBSD?


-adrian


More information about the freebsd-net mailing list