Problems with two interfaces on the same subnet?

[Ivan Voras]

On 12/02/2013 18:57, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 12/02/2013 18:52, Freddie Cash wrote:
>> Any reason you can't just use lagg(4) in one of the non-LACP modes?  That's
>> bascially designed to do exactly what you want.
> 
> No particular reason, I'm just not familiar enough with it. Will e.g.
> the "loadbalance" mode "just work" ? Should I expect any problems?

Actually, I know next to nothing about link aggregation. How do ARP
requests get solved? Would an attached L3-aware switch see the same IP
address on two ports? Since "loadbalance" chooses ports based on a hash,
it will probably start dropping 50% of the outgoing traffic if one of
the two links dies?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/attachments/20130212/409652d9/attachment.sig>