Problems with two interfaces on the same subnet?

[Freddie Cash]

Any reason you can't just use lagg(4) in one of the non-LACP modes?  That's
bascially designed to do exactly what you want.


On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Ivan Voras <ivoras at freebsd.org> wrote:

> On 12/02/2013 18:38, Eggert, Lars wrote:
>
> > This sounds like your default route is going via igb2.
>
> Yes, it is.
>
> > You can make this work with ipfw rules (and I guess also setfib,
> although I have not tried that.)
>
> The concept of FIBs looks clean and applicable but setfib works on newly
> started process, and I would need to do something like apply it to
> packets coming from an interface.
>
> I've found previous posts on "policy routing" with ipfw
> (
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2004-April/001839.html
> )
> but this is probably not what I need; I would need that packets
> generated as a response to incoming packets go to the same interface as
> the incoming packet. Or are you thinking of hard-coding client addresses
> in ipfw rules so that packets going to specific IPs go to a specific
> interface?
>
>
>


-- 
Freddie Cash
fjwcash at gmail.com