Watchdog timeout em driver 8.2-R

Jack Vogel jfvogel at gmail.com
Wed Apr 18 21:56:57 UTC 2012


On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Lars Wilke <lw at lwilke.de> wrote:

> Hi Jack,
>
> thanks for your response.
>
> * Jack Vogel wrote:
> >  On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Lars Wilke <lw at lwilke.de> wrote:
> > >   Apr 13 08:53:07 san02 kernel: em1: Watchdog timeout -- resetting
> > >   Apr 13 08:53:07 san02 kernel: em1: Queue(0) tdh = 232, hw tdt = 190
> > >   Apr 13 08:53:07 san02 kernel: em1: TX(0) desc avail = 31,Next TX to
> > >   Clean = 221
> > >   Apr 13 08:53:07 san02 kernel: em1: Link is Down
> > >   Apr 13 08:53:07 san02 kernel: em1: link state changed to DOWN
> > >
> > > Sometimes nothing for days, sometimes under high Network load (NFSv3),
> > > sometimes
> > > multiple times a day. I see this message/behaviour on always the same
> two
> > > of the
> > > four interfaces (em1 and em3).
> > >
> > > Then the NIC does not have the ACTIVE flag anymore, an ifconfig em1 up
> > > solves the issue. But why does it loose the ACTIVE state and why does
> the
> > > NIC reset itself in the first place?
> > >
> >
> >  Because a watchdog reset is just that, a reset, so it causes the
> hardware to
> >  reinitialize. It should come back up, I do not know why it did not,
> maybe
> >  the renegotiation with the switch fails for some reason?
>
> Hm, my main problem is that it did a reset in the first place.
>
> >  One thought is to get the latest em driver and see if the behavior
> changes,
> >  if that driver is the distributed 8.2 its pretty old.
>
> ok then i guess i will upgrade to 8.3-R, is the driver there reasonably
> new?
>
>
Yes, that should be fine.

Jack


More information about the freebsd-net mailing list