Problem with new source address selection
Bjoern A. Zeeb
bzeeb-lists at lists.zabbadoz.net
Thu Nov 27 08:50:07 PST 2008
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Frank Behrens wrote:
I am running out the door but ... will check again tonight.
> Bjoern A. Zeeb <bzeeb-lists at lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote on 27 Nov 2008 14:53:
[gif-like ipsec and routes]
routes are not alternatives for fixing applications;) Often it's easier
to apply a hack instead of fix the application but that's a different
>> So is your 192.168.90.0/24 on any other interface but the lo2?
>> Is it the only network on that interface or are there aliases?
> For this machine the simplified setup is:
> - an ethernet interface for private net with address 192.168.90.1/24
> and additional aliases for external addresses
> Now I want to tunnel between my 192.168.90.0/24 and a foreign
> 192.168.200.0/24. So I assigned 192.168.90.254/32 to lo2 and created
> a static route.
So if you don't mind to go out with a source address of 192.168.90.1
instead of .254, what about this hack. What happens if you change the
route change -net 192.168.200.0/24 192.168.90.2
(assuming the .2 is not on your local machine).
Bjoern A. Zeeb Stop bit received. Insert coin for new game.
More information about the freebsd-net