HEADSUP: arp-v2 has been committed

[Doug Barton]

Li, Qing wrote:
> I don't think we can provide binary compatibility without putting
> back RTF_LLINFO exactly as it was. My preference is to continue down 
> the new path without RTF_LLINFO.

Out of curiosity, what's your reasoning for this decision? If I've
missed this explanation previously, my apologies.

Doug

-- 

    This .signature sanitized for your protection