IPv6 <-> NAT <-> IPv4 ... possible?
Marc G. Fournier
freebsd at hub.org
Thu Oct 18 22:47:49 PDT 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Could I hide an IPv6 network behind NAT? I don't know if that is even possible
... the IPv6 IPs would be private (equiv to 192.168.x.x) ... basically, none of
the hosts behind NAT need a public IP, *but* I may end up with more then 256
hosts, so was wondering if using IPv6 behind the NAT would be 'simplier' ...
If possible, pointers to docs to read would be appreciated ...
Thanks ...
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy at hub.org MSN . scrappy at hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFHGETv4QvfyHIvDvMRApvkAKCiOKnBaN1dvhAX6f5SxXUBk9DreQCdEqh0
QbNARJ2zQhsnlOn33OfNe38=
=zWda
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the freebsd-net
mailing list