TCP URG point

Andre Oppermann andre at
Sun Jul 3 01:02:13 GMT 2005

Li, Qing wrote:
> 	It appears the TCP urgent pointer is off by 1.
> 	In RFC-1122, section on Page 83 describes the
> 	urgent pointer error in RFC-793.
> 	The 6.0-CURRENT code has the urgent pointer set
> 	to (LAST+1).
> 	Any comments before I sent a PR ?

No, please do and send me the PR number.

freebsd-current at mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe at"

More information about the freebsd-net mailing list